No repeat of 2005, but a very very good game. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ponting was safe in the commentary box this time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In terms of time – the distance between now and ’05 is the same as ’05 and 86\/87 and for cricket fans that’ll have some meaning. If only to make us feel a little older and realise “we are” entering another era in which “we” become the Statesmen, like it or not. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In ’05 I was backpacking my way down America’s West Coast and the communal computer in the hostel I was staying in was only sporadically available. Suffice to say when I did get use of the internet I searched for the scorecard, did the Maths, took in a bit of West Coast Culture and returned to watch the figures move in the favour of Flintoff and co. No cricket fans handy to celebrate with that day but a wide smile on my face. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
It wasn’t to be yesterday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rain delayed the start. I finally managed to do something other than follow cricket for a few hours, and was pretty productive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Aussies played the long game. England had to really toil hard. Khawaja was utterly brilliant until Stokes pulled a rabbit out the hat and got him to play on. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
But hats off to Cummins. Captain, Bowler and 40 essential runs at the end. Aussies win by 2 wickets. It could not have been much tighter. To Lords. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
No repeat of 2005, but a very very good game. Ponting was safe in the commentary box this time. In terms of time – the distance between now and ’05 is the same as ’05 and 86\/87 and for cricket … Continue reading